Coordinating on ad-hoc semantic systems in dialogue
نویسنده
چکیده
An exploratory study of a Map Task dialogue indicates that dialogue participants coordinate on an ad-hoc vocabulary and associated concepts (meanings) to enable information exchange, and that ad-hoc vocabularies can be cobbled together from a heterogeneous mix of “micro-vocabularies” borrowed from various other (a priori unrelated) domains. To account for these observations, we sketch a basic framework for formalising the process of coordination of semantic systems in dialogue, and relate this framework to some interactional processes of semantic coordination in dialogue, such as feedback, negotiation and accommodation. 1 Vocabulary in a Map Task dialogue In theMap Task corpus1, a GIVER explains a route, provided on the giver’s map, to a FOLLOWER who has a similar (but slightly different) map but with no route marked. A map contains landmarks portrayed as labelled line drawings. In a route-giving task like that recorded in the Map Task corpus, expressions referring to landmarks, compass directions etc. can be a priori expected as a kind of “prototype” devices for talking about maps. A typical utterance may look as follows2: GIVER: right a camera shop, right, head due south ... from that just ... down for about twelve centimetres, have you got a parked van at the bottom ? http://www.hcrc.ed.ac.uk/maptask/ maptask-description.html The following excerpts are taken from Map Task dialogue q4nc4, available at the Map Task web site. Here, we may note two constructions expressing direction (“south”, “down”), one expressing a distance (“twelve centimetres”) and two referring to landmarks (“a camera shop”, “a parked van”). A further example: GIVER: go round the left hand side of the camera shop ... in between the edge of the page and the camera shop. Whereas the previous expressions were completely expected given the general direction-giving task, the reference to an absolute position using “the edge of the page” is perhaps less expected. Clearly, this is a consequence of the dialogue participants (DPs) talking about a (paper) map rather than e.g. about some actual terrain. GIVER: so you’re ... you’re going diagonally sort of north ... northeast ... it’s not it’s it’s a sort of two o’clock almost three o’clock ... from the allotments ... over Here, we have GIVER referring to map directions using the expressions “two o’clock” and “three o’clock”. This is most likely an everyday variant of the practice of English-speaking pilots of using “o’clock” for directions3. Let’s look at a final excerpt: GIVER: right, you go ... down the side of the camera shop right for about twelve centimetres ... and do a sort of a ”u” shape ... for and the bottom of the ”u” shape should be about three centimetres long, right do you know what i’m
منابع مشابه
All together now . . . This time with meaning : A hierarchical lexicon for semantic coordination
Classically, semantic theories have assumed that words are endowed with universal, immutable meanings. This assumption is not tenable when modeling natural language dialogue; far from treating word meanings as fixed entities, linguistic agents are constantly coordinating useful semantic conventions. They disambiguate polysemous words, construct ad hoc interpretations particular to their communi...
متن کاملCluster Based Cross Layer Intelligent Service Discovery for Mobile Ad-Hoc Networks
The ability to discover services in Mobile Ad hoc Network (MANET) is a major prerequisite. Cluster basedcross layer intelligent service discovery for MANET (CBISD) is cluster based architecture, caching ofsemantic details of services and intelligent forwarding using network layer mechanisms. The cluster basedarchitecture using semantic knowledge provides scalability and accuracy. Also, the mini...
متن کاملFormalizing the Dynamics of Semantic Sys- tems in Dialogue
Semantic change happens both in the long term (over years and decades) and in the very short term (in a single dialogue)1. An exploratory study of a Map Task dialogue indicates that dialogue participants coordinate on an ad-hoc vocabulary and associated concepts (meanings) to enable information exchange, and that adhoc vocabularies can be cobbled together from a heterogeneous mix of “microvocab...
متن کاملA Concurrent, Distributed, and Incremental Spoken Dialogue Architecture with a First Application to Prosody
Current-day spoken dialogue systems are tedious to interact with (Ward et al. 2005). eir naturalness and (measurable) quality of interaction can be improved through incremental (step-by-step) processing schemes that enable dialogue systems to interact continuously (Baumann 2013). However, incremental models have not yet adequately addressed the challenge of joint decision making and optimizatio...
متن کاملA Survey of Solutions to Protect Against All Types of Attacks in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks
In recent years mobile networks have expanded dramatically, compared with other wireless networks. Routing protocols in these networks are designed with the assumption that there is no attacker node, so routing protocols are vulnerable to various attacks in these networks. In this paper, we review the network layer attacks and then we simulate the impact of black hole attack on ad hoc on demand...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2007